Removing restrictions on trout.
-
- Rank: Banjo
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 10:21 pm
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
also, as far as trout restrictions go, let's not forget that we still have a bag limit of 5 for tench and roach in Victoria for christ's sake.
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:50 pm
- Location: SE Melbourne
- Has liked: 15 times
- Likes received: 8 times
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
Firstly there's no such thing as reverse racism. It's either racist or it's not. Secondly applying racism to fish is ridiculous in my opinion. Third, I've yet to meet a trout that can out fight a bass of similar size. Even carp fight betterBob Nudd wrote:i could never undestand the obsession with native fish. i take all fish at their face value, based on sport and eating qualities and i'll take trout over natives any day. saying that natives are better because they are, well, natives is nothing but a reverse racism.
having said that, i think the fisheries do a pretty terrible job when it comes to lakes and reservoirs management as their number one goal should be creation of self sustained fish population, but instead they stock fish that don't breed in lakes. pointless.
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:23 pm
- Has liked: 308 times
- Likes received: 318 times
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
LOL Reverse Racism.Basti wrote:Firstly there's no such thing as reverse racism. It's either racist or it's not. Secondly applying racism to fish is ridiculous in my opinion. Third, I've yet to meet a trout that can out fight a bass of similar size. Even carp fight betterBob Nudd wrote:i could never undestand the obsession with native fish. i take all fish at their face value, based on sport and eating qualities and i'll take trout over natives any day. saying that natives are better because they are, well, natives is nothing but a reverse racism.
having said that, i think the fisheries do a pretty terrible job when it comes to lakes and reservoirs management as their number one goal should be creation of self sustained fish population, but instead they stock fish that don't breed in lakes. pointless.
Should become a meme
There is always more to learn , fish to catch , places to see and friends to make.
- mazman
- Rank: Murray Cod
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:45 pm
- Has liked: 137 times
- Likes received: 455 times
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
The obsession with native fish as I understand comes partly from the manner in which they are targeted and fight, tendency to live close to structure and hit lures and baits aggressively once they commit. The other side however is much more relevant to the topic at hand, Native fish in australia have survived and evolved to coexist in the same waterways as each other, the introduction of new species to these waterways is crowding out some native species by filling the niche they once occupied while the smaller species are being hunted at an unsustainable rate and populations are declining. Have a read of some of the journals and articles broomstick has linked for a few specific examples.
As far as the stocking of rainbow trout for put and take fisheries go my understanding is that trout aren't overly dear to breed, grow fast and aren't overly difficult to catch. The aim of these fish is to introduce newcomers to the sport and I imagine officials would be looking to do so in the most cost efficient manner hence the decision to go with trout.
Cheers Alex
As far as the stocking of rainbow trout for put and take fisheries go my understanding is that trout aren't overly dear to breed, grow fast and aren't overly difficult to catch. The aim of these fish is to introduce newcomers to the sport and I imagine officials would be looking to do so in the most cost efficient manner hence the decision to go with trout.
Cheers Alex
Youtube channel:Hawkesy Fishing
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:59 pm
- Has liked: 567 times
- Likes received: 1011 times
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
Might as well set the whole f@C%$^ng country on fire then, as it is even the Naitives ( kangaroo and Dingo) are shot cause they are considered as causing too much trouble nowdays.Tackleberry wrote:same as all the pretty bambi deer and wild horses running around the high country their all vermin and should be shoot on sight
just like dogs cats goats and pigs .
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:23 pm
- Has liked: 308 times
- Likes received: 318 times
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
purple5ive wrote:Might as well set the whole f@C%$^ng country on fire then, as it is even the Naitives ( kangaroo and Dingo) are shot cause they are considered as causing too much trouble nowdays.Tackleberry wrote:same as all the pretty bambi deer and wild horses running around the high country their all vermin and should be shoot on sight
just like dogs cats goats and pigs .
Im guessing thats an eventuality.
There is always more to learn , fish to catch , places to see and friends to make.
-
- Rank: Banjo
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 10:21 pm
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
what's your interpretation of OP's (an obvious troll but still) chain of thought that all non-native species should be automatically declared noxious? if that's not fish racism, i don't know what is.Basti wrote:Firstly there's no such thing as reverse racism. It's either racist or it's not. Secondly applying racism to fish is ridiculous in my opinion.
-
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:50 pm
- Location: SE Melbourne
- Has liked: 15 times
- Likes received: 8 times
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
i agree with him. leaving aside the fact that anglers find it fun to catch them (and the money this generates) can you name one other benefit that introduced species have had on this country?Bob Nudd wrote:what's your interpretation of OP's (an obvious troll but still) chain of thought that all non-native species should be automatically declared noxious? if that's not fish racism, i don't know what is.Basti wrote:Firstly there's no such thing as reverse racism. It's either racist or it's not. Secondly applying racism to fish is ridiculous in my opinion.
- 4liters
- Rank: Premium Member
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:05 am
- Has liked: 6 times
- Likes received: 673 times
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
Well they've inspired the posting of this majestic thread...Basti wrote:i agree with him. leaving aside the fact that anglers find it fun to catch them (and the money this generates) can you name one other benefit that introduced species have had on this country?Bob Nudd wrote:what's your interpretation of OP's (an obvious troll but still) chain of thought that all non-native species should be automatically declared noxious? if that's not fish racism, i don't know what is.Basti wrote:Firstly there's no such thing as reverse racism. It's either racist or it's not. Secondly applying racism to fish is ridiculous in my opinion.
2015/16 Fisting Victoria Species comp total: 289cm
Brown Trout: 37cm
Flathead: 51cm; Squid: 36cm; Australian Salmon: 51cm; Snapper 46cm; Silver Trevally 23cm; KGW: 45cm
Major Sponsor: Rim Master Tackle
Brown Trout: 37cm
Flathead: 51cm; Squid: 36cm; Australian Salmon: 51cm; Snapper 46cm; Silver Trevally 23cm; KGW: 45cm
Major Sponsor: Rim Master Tackle
-
- Rank: Banjo
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 10:21 pm
Re: Removing restrictions on trout.
why would i leave it aside? that's in fact the only thing that matters.Basti wrote:Bob Nudd wrote:leaving aside the fact that anglers find it fun to catch them (and the money this generates)